From bec@haystack.mit.edu Mon Oct 25 18:13:51 MET 1999
Received: from dopey.haystack.edu (dopey.haystack.edu [192.52.61.54]) by picasso.geod.uni-bonn.de with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.8) id SAA11989 for <petrov@picasso.geod.uni-bonn.de>; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:13:50 +0200 (METDST)
Received: (from bec@localhost)
	by dopey.haystack.edu (8.8.6 (sendmail_886_v2)/8.8.6) id MAA19252;
	Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:11:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Corey <bec@haystack.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199910251611.MAA19252@dopey.haystack.edu>
Subject: Re: Yebes talk. Proposlas.
To: petrov@picasso.geod.uni-bonn.de (Leonid Petrov)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:11:46 EDT
In-Reply-To: <199910251540.RAA11931@picasso.geod.uni-bonn.de>; from "Leonid Petrov" at Oct 25, 99 5:40 pm
X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 109.18]
Status: R

Dear Leonid,

Have you tried fringing the Europe-51 Yebes data with manual phases?

It's striking to me that the time interval when the temperature was
fluctuating the most -- roughly between 13 and 15 hours -- is just 
when the phase cal and delay rates have their largest scatter.

Call me stubborn...

 --Brian